西南印度洋脊14°E—25°E区域洋壳增生的构造与岩浆特征

doi:10.11978/2016119

热带海洋学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 1-11.doi: 10.11978/2016119CSTR: 32234.14.2016119

所属专题：海上丝绸之路专题

• • 下一篇

西南印度洋脊14°E—25°E区域洋壳增生的构造与岩浆特征

查财财^1,³(), 林间^1,²()

1. 中国科学院边缘海与大洋地质重点实验室(南海海洋研究所), 广东广州 510301
2. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;

收稿日期:2016-11-19 修回日期:2017-02-02 出版日期:2017-11-30 发布日期:2018-01-18
作者简介:作者简介：查财财(1991#cod#x02014;), 男, 安徽省安庆市人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事大洋中脊构造与地球物理特征研究。E-mail: zhacaicai2012@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院项目(QYZDY-SSW-DQC005、Y4SL021001、YZ201325、YZ201534);国家自然科学基金项目(91628301、U1606401、41676044)

Magmatic and tectonic extension at the Southwest Indian Ridge between 14°E and 25°E

Caicai ZHA^1,³, Jian LIN^2,¹

1. CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Guangzhou 510301, China
2. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2016-11-19 Revised:2017-02-02 Online:2017-11-30 Published:2018-01-18
About author:Author:QIU Chunhua.E-mail: qiuchh3@mail. sysu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Chinese Academy of Sciences Project (QYZDY-SSW-DQC005, Y4SL021001, YZ201325, YZ201534);National Natural Science Foundation of China (91628301, U1606401, 41676044)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

文章利用高精度船载多波束测深及重力数据研究了超慢速西南印度洋脊14#cod#x000b0;E#cod#x02014;25#cod#x000b0;E区域洋壳增生的构造与岩浆特征。首先采用滤波的方法将原始地形数据分为短波长地形(波长小于20km)和长波长地形(波长大于20km)。然后利用长波长地形剖面获得洋中脊裂谷的深度, 利用短波长地形剖面和坡度来识别正断层, 并计算出岩浆作用在整个扩张过程中所占的比例, 即M值。同时从自由空气重力异常中去除海底地形、参考莫霍面以及板块冷却等重力效应, 获取能够表征相对洋壳厚度的剩余地幔布格重力异常(Residual Mantle Bouguer Anomaly, RMBA)。最后在垂直于洋脊的剖面上以10km宽的窗口计算出一系列窗口内的M值、平均RMBA值以及断层的垂直断距, 并探讨它们之间的相关性。研究发现在超慢速扩张的西南印度洋脊14#cod#x000b0;E#cod#x02014;25#cod#x000b0;E区域, 岩浆率M值随时间和空间变化明显, 裂谷深度呈现较强的两翼不对称性, 裂谷深度在一定程度上反映了脊轴附近的平均M值。区域性的平均构造拉伸率(即1-M)处于20%~50%之间, 南翼整体处于较强的拉伸状态。统计结果表明, 在岩浆作用较强的时期, M值偏大, 通常产生较厚的洋壳以及断距较小的断层。

关键词: 西南印度洋脊, 构造, 岩浆, M值, 多波束地形, 剩余地幔布格重力异常

Abstract:

In this study we used the high-resolution shipboard multibeam bathymetry and gravity data to investigate the tectonic and magmatic characteristics of the Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) between 14#cod#x000b0;and 25#cod#x000b0;E. First, we filtered the original bathymetry to obtain a short-wavelength bathymetry map (wavelength less than 20 km), which was used together with the topographic slope map to identify surface normal faults. We also obtained a long-wavelength bathymetry map (wavelength more than 20 km) that was used to calculate across-ridge axis topographic relief. We also calculated the fraction of plate separation accommodated by magmatic accretion, i.e., the M factor. We then calculated the Residual Mantle Bouguer Anomaly (RMBA) by removing from the free-air gravity anomaly the gravitational effects of water/crust and crust/mantle interfaces as well as lithospheric plate cooling, assuming a reference crustal thickness of 6 km. Finally, we calculated the M factor, the mean values of RMBA, and fault throws within 10-km- wide running windows along profiles across the ridge axis and investigated the correlations among these parameters. We found that the magma supply varied significantly in time and space at the SWIR between 14#cod#x000b0;and 25#cod#x000b0;E and the axial relief showed strong asymmetry between conjugate ridge flanks that seemed to be controlled by the mean M factor near the ridge axis. Regionally-averaged tectonic extensional strains (i.e., 1-M) were about 20%~50% and the southern flank underwent greater average tectonic extensional strains. Areas with thicker crust (i.e., more negative RMBA) are often associated with greater M values and smaller fault throws, indicating episodes of increased local 3D magma supply at this ultraslow spreading ridge.

Key words: Southwest Indian Ridge, tectonism, magmatism, M factor, multibeam bathymetry, Residual Mantle Bouguer Anomaly

中图分类号:

P736.1

查财财, 林间. 西南印度洋脊14°E—25°E区域洋壳增生的构造与岩浆特征[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(6): 1-11.

Caicai ZHA, Jian LIN. Magmatic and tectonic extension at the Southwest Indian Ridge between 14°E and 25°E[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2017, 36(6): 1-11.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 40

[1]	BALLARD R D, VAN ANDEL T H, 1977. Morphology and tectonics of the inner rift valley at lat 36#cod#x000b0;50#cod#x02032;N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 88(4): 507-530.
[2]	BEHN M D, ITO G, 2008. Magmatic and tectonic extension at mid-ocean ridges: 1. Controls on fault characteristics[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9(8): Q08O10, doi: 10.1029/2008GC001965.
[3]	BUCK W R, LAVIER L L, POLIAKOV A N B, 2005. Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Nature, 434(7034): 719-723.
[4]	BUCK W R, POLIAKOV A N B, 1998. Abyssal hills formed by stretching oceanic lithosphere[J]. Nature, 392(6673): 272-275.
[5]	CANN J R, BLACKMAN D K, SMITH D K, et al, 1997. Corrugated slip surfaces formed at ridge-transform intersections on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Nature, 385(6614): 329-332.
[6]	CANNAT M, ROMMEVAUX-JESTIN C, FUJIMOTO H, 2003. Melt supply variations to a magma-poor ultra-slow spreading ridge (Southwest Indian Ridge 61#cod#x000b0; to 69#cod#x000b0;E)[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4(8): 9104, doi: 10.1029/2002GC000480.
[7]	CANNAT M, SAUTER D, MENDEL V, et al, 2006. Modes of seafloor generation at a melt-poor ultraslow-spreading ridge[J]. Geology, 34(7): 605-608.
[8]	CHEN YONGSHUN, MORGAN W J, 1990a. A nonlinear rheology model for mid-ocean ridge axis topography[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B11): 17583-17604.
[9]	CHEN YONGSHUN, MORGAN W J, 1990b. Rift valley/no rift valley transition at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B11): 17571-17581.
[10]	DICK H J B, LIN JIAN, SCHOUTEN H, 2003. An ultraslow- spreading class of ocean ridge[J]. Nature, 426(6965): 405-412.
[11]	ESCART#cod#x000cd;N J, COWIE P A, SEARLE R C, et al, 1999. Quantifying tectonic strain and magmatic accretion at a slow spreading ridge segment, Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 29#cod#x000b0;N[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(B5): 10421-10437.
[12]	FORNARI D J, HAYMON R M, PERFIT M R, et al, 1998. Axial summit trough of the East Pacific Rice 9#cod#x000b0;#cod#x02014;10#cod#x000b0;N: Geological characteristics and evolution of the axial zone on fast spreading mid-ocean ridge[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B5): 9827-9855.
[13]	GOFF J A, MA YING, SHAH A, et al, 1997. Stochastic analysis of seafloor morphology on the flank of the Southeast Indian Ridge: the influence of ridge morphology on the formation of abyssal hills[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B7): 15521-15534.
[14]	GRINDLAY N R, MADSEN J A, ROMMEVAUX-JESTIN C, et al, 1998. A different pattern of ridge segmentation and mantle Bouguer gravity anomalies along the ultra-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (15#cod#x000b0;30#cod#x02032;E to 25#cod#x000b0;E)[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 161(1-4): 243-253.
[15]	HEEZEN B C, 1960. The rift in the ocean floor[J]. Scientific American, 203(4): 98-110.
[16]	HOWELL S M, ITO G, BEHN M D, et al, 2016. Magmatic and tectonic extension at the Chile Ridge: evidence for mantle controls on ridge segmentation[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 17(6): 2354-2373, doi: 10.1002/2016GC006380.
[17]	ITO G, BEHN M D, 2008. Magmatic and tectonic extension at mid-ocean ridges: 2. Origin of axial morphology[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9(9): Q09O12, doi: 10.1029/2008GC001970.
[18]	KUO BANYUAN, FORSYTH D W, 1988. Gravity anomalies of the ridge-transform system in the South Atlantic between 31 and 34.5#cod#x000b0;S: Upwelling centers and variations in crustal thickness[J]. Marine Geophysical Researches, 10(3): 205-232.
[19]	LI JIABIAO, JIAN HANCHAO, CHEN Y J, et al, 2015. Seismic observation of an extremely magmatic accretion at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(8): 2656-2663.
[20]	LIN J, PURDY G, SCHOUTEN H, et al, 1990. Evidence from gravity data for focused magmatic accretion along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Nature, 344(6267): 627-632.
[21]	LIN JIAN, PARMENTIER E M, 1989. Mechanisms of lithospheric extension at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 96(1): 1-22.
[22]	LIN JIAN, PHIPPS MORGAN J, 1992. The spreading rate dependence of three-dimensional mid-ocean ridge gravity structure[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 19(1): 13-16.
[23]	MACDONALD K C, 1982. MID-OCEAN RIDGES: fine scale tectonic, volcanic and hydrothermal processes within the plate boundary zone[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 10: 155-190.
[24]	MACLEOD C J, SEARLE R C, MURTON B J, et al, 2009. Life cycle of oceanic core complexes[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 287(3-4): 333-344.
[25]	MENDEL V, SAUTER D, ROMMEVAUX-JESTIN C, et al, 2003. Magmato-tectonic cyclicity at the ultra-slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge: Evidence from variations of axial volcanic ridge morphology and abyssal hills pattern[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4(5): 9102, doi: 10.1029/2002GC000417.
[26]	OKINO K, MATSUDA K, CHRISTIE D M, et al, 2004. Development of oceanic detachment and asymmetric spreading at the Australian-Antarctic Discordance[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 5(12): Q12012, doi: 10.1029/2004gc000793.
[27]	OLSON C J, BECKER J J, SANDWELL D T, 2014. A new global bathymetry map at 15 arcsecond resolution for resolving seafloor fabric: SRTM15_PLUS[C]//AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. San Francisco: AGU, 1: 3.
[28]	PATRIAT P, SAUTER D, MUNSCHY M, et al, 1997. A survey of the Southwest Indian Ridge axis between Atlantis II fracture zone and the Indian Ocean triple junction: regional setting and large scale segmentation[J]. Marine Geophysical Researches, 19(6): 457-480.
[29]	SAUTER D, CANNAT M, ROUM#cod#x000c9;JON S, et al, 2013. Continuous exhumation of mantle-derived rocks at the Southwest Indian Ridge for 11 million years[J]. Nature Geoscience, 6(4): 314-320.
[30]	SEMP#cod#x000c9;R#cod#x000c9; J-C, PURDY G M, SCHOUTEN H, 1990. Segmentation of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between 24#cod#x000b0; N and 30#cod#x000b0;40' N[J]. Nature, 344(6265): 427-431.
[31]	SEMP#cod#x000c9;R#cod#x000c9; J-C, PALMER J, CHRISTIE D M, et al, 1991. Australian-Antarctic discordance[J]. Geology, 19(5): 429-432.
[32]	SHAH A K, SEMP#cod#x000c9;R#cod#x000c9; J C, 1998. Morphology of the transition from an axial high to a rift valley at the Southeast Indian Ridge and the relation to variations in mantle temperature[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B3): 5203-5223.
[33]	SHAW P R, 1992. Ridge segmentation, faulting and crustal thickness in the Atlantic Ocean[J]. Nature, 358(6386): 490-493.
[34]	SHAW P R, LIN JIAN, 1993. Causes and consequences of variations in faulting style at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(B12): 21839-21851.
[35]	SHAW W J, LIN JIAN, 1996. Models of ocean ridge lithospheric deformation: Dependence on crustal thickness, spreading rate, and segmentation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(B8): 17977-17993.
[36]	STANDISH J J, DICK H J B, MICHAEL P J, et al, 2008. MORB generation beneath the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (9-25#cod#x000b0;E): Major element chemistry and the importance of process versus source[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9(5): Q05004, doi: 10.1029/2008GC001959.
[37]	TAPPONNIER P, FRANCHETEAU J, 1978. Necking of the lithosphere and the mechanics of slowly accreting plate boundaries[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(B8): 3955-3970.
[38]	TUCHOLKE B E, BEHN M D, BUCK W R, et al, 2008. Role of melt supply in oceanic detachment faulting and formation of megamullions[J]. Geology, 36(6): 455-458.
[39]	TUCHOLKE B E, LIN JIAN, 1994. A geological model for the structure of ridge segments in slow spreading ocean crust[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(B6): 11937-11958.
[40]	TUCHOLKE B E, LIN JIAN, KLEINROCK M C, 1998. Megamullions and mullion structure defining oceanic metamorphic core complexes on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B5): 9857-9866.

西南印度洋脊14°E—25°E区域洋壳增生的构造与岩浆特征

Magmatic and tectonic extension at the Southwest Indian Ridge between 14°E and 25°E

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邱燕, 鞠东, 黄文凯, 王英民, 聂鑫. 南海中央海盆海底初始扩张时间的重新认定[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2024, 43(2): 154-165.
[2]	赵中贤, 孙珍, 毛云华, 张伙带. 南海北部陆缘不均匀伸展及脉动式构造升降史^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(3): 96-115.
[3]	刘守金,林间,罗怡鸣. 东南印度洋中脊(108°—134°E区域)断层构造与岩浆活动关系[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(4): 70-80.
[4]	徐子英, 汪俊, 高红芳, 孙桂华, 孙美静, 聂鑫, 朱荣伟. 南海海盆中南—礼乐断裂带研究进展^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(2): 86-94.
[5]	赵斌, 高红芳, 张衡, 李丽青. 基于深度域地震成像的中沙海槽盆地东北部结构构造研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(2): 95-102.
[6]	徐东海, 王利杰, 姚永坚, 孙珍, 邱宁. 礼乐盆地碳酸盐岩时空分布特征及构造意义[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(6): 49-62.
[7]	刘见宝, 孙珍, 王振峰, 黄安敏, 曾小宇. 南海北部新生代构造应力反演及其动力学背景探讨*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(2): 63-71.
[8]	薛力园, 丁旋, 裴人傑, 万晓樵. 南海北部陆丰凹陷LF14井中新世古水深变化及沉降特征*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(2): 72-83.
[9]	于俊辉, 阎贫, 林间. 南海西南次海盆与超慢速扩张西南印度洋中脊地壳结构对比^#cod#x0002A;[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(6): 51-61.
[10]	李亚清, 阎贫, 王彦林, 钟广见. 东沙群岛西南海区海底地震测线OBS2015-1揭示的深部地壳结构^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(5): 83-92.
[11]	谢志远, 杨建民, 孙龙涛, 郑金云, 孙珍, 邱宁. 南海北缘白云凹陷北坡裂后断裂活动特征及构造沉积响应^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(5): 59-71.
[12]	周蒂, 孙珍. 晚中生代以来太平洋域板块过程及其对东亚陆缘构造研究的启示[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(3): 1-19.
[13]	孙珍, 刘思青, 庞雄, 姜建群, 毛爽. 被动大陆边缘伸展-破裂过程研究进展[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(1): 1-16.
[14]	冯英辞, 詹文欢, 姚衍桃, 孙杰, 刘守金, 李健. 西沙群岛礁区的地质构造及其活动性分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2015, 34(3): 48-53.
[15]	丛晓荣, 于兴河, 苏明, 沙志斌, 吴能友. 南海北部陆坡区晚中新世以来沉降特征[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(6): 42-49.